MRSA was isolated from the nares of 27/417 (6.5%) attendees at an international veterinary conference: 23/345 (7.0%) veterinarians,
4/34 (12.0%) technicians, and 0/38 others. Colonization was more common for large-animal (15/96, 15.6%) than small-animal personnel (12/271, 4.4%)
or those with no animal patient contact (0/50) (p < 0.001). Large-animal practice was the only variable significantly associated with colonization
(odds ratio 2.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2-6.6). Two predominant clones were identified with similar distribution among veterinarians, as previously
reported for horses and companion animals. Canadian epidemic MRSA-2 (CMRSA) was isolated from 11 small-animal and 2 large-animal personnel from the
United States (n = 12) and Germany (n = 1). In contrast, CMRSA-5 was isolated exclusively from large-animal personnel (p < 0.001) in the United States
(n = 10), United Kingdom (n = 2), and Denmark (n = 1). MRSA colonization may be an occupational risk for veterinary professionals.
Hanselman et al, Emerg Infect Dis 12:1933-38, 2006.
|